Main Page > Articles > Basis Trading > Case Study: A Year of Trading the Crack Spread - Profits, Losses, and Lessons Learned

Case Study: A Year of Trading the Crack Spread - Profits, Losses, and Lessons Learned

From TradingHabits, the trading encyclopedia · 5 min read · February 28, 2026
The Black Book of Day Trading Strategies
Free Book

The Black Book of Day Trading Strategies

1,000 complete strategies · 31 chapters · Full trade plans

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. This case study is an exploration of that difference, a journey into the real-world challenges and rewards of trading the crack spread." - The author

After exploring the theoretical underpinnings of commodity spread trading, from the fundamentals of the crack and crush spreads to the complexities of quantitative analysis and high-frequency trading, it is time to ground our discussion in the messy reality of the market. This article will present a detailed case study of a hypothetical year of trading the 3:2:1 crack spread. We will follow the journey of a proprietary trader as they navigate the volatile energy markets, experiencing both the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat. Through this case study, we will seek to extract valuable lessons about risk management, discipline, and the psychological challenges of trading.

The Strategy: Mean Reversion

Our trader, Alex, has developed a mean-reversion strategy for trading the 3:2:1 crack spread. The strategy is based on the observation that the crack spread, while volatile, tends to revert to a long-term average. Alex's model identifies trading opportunities by looking for significant deviations from this average. The rules are simple:

  • Buy the spread when it falls to two standard deviations below its 200-day moving average.
  • Sell the spread when it rises to two standard deviations above its 200-day moving average.
  • The position is held until the spread reverts to its 200-day moving average.

A Year in the Life of a Crack Spread Trader

The following table provides a log of Alex's trades over the course of a hypothetical year:

DateActionSpread Value200-day MASignalP/L
Jan 15Buy$15.00$25.00Buy (2 std dev below MA)-
Feb 20Sell$24.50$25.20Exit (reverted to MA)+$9,500
Apr 05Sell$35.00$26.00Sell (2 std dev above MA)-
May 10Buy$26.50$26.30Exit (reverted to MA)+$8,500
Jul 01Buy$18.00$27.00Buy (2 std dev below MA)-
Aug 15Sell$22.00$26.50Stop Loss (spread continued to fall)-$6,000
Oct 01Sell$38.00$28.00Sell (2 std dev above MA)-
Nov 10Buy$28.50$28.20Exit (reverted to MA)+$9,500

Data is hypothetical for illustrative purposes. P/L is based on a position size of 10 spreads (30 crude oil contracts).

Performance Analysis

At the end of the year, Alex's trading strategy has generated a net profit of $21,500. To evaluate the performance of the strategy more rigorously, we can calculate its Sharpe ratio. The Sharpe ratio measures the risk-adjusted return of an investment. The formula is:

Sharpe Ratio = (Average Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Standard Deviation of Returns

Assuming a risk-free rate of 2% and a standard deviation of returns of 15%, Alex's Sharpe ratio would be:

Sharpe Ratio = (Net Profit / Initial Capital - Risk-Free Rate) / Standard Deviation of Returns

Assuming an initial capital of $100,000, the Sharpe ratio would be:

Sharpe Ratio = (21,500/100,000 - 0.02) / 0.15 = 1.30

A Sharpe ratio greater than 1 is generally considered to be good, indicating that the strategy has generated a solid return for the level of risk taken.

Lessons Learned

This case study offers several important lessons for aspiring spread traders:

  • Discipline is Key: Alex's success was due in large part to their disciplined adherence to their trading plan. They did not let emotions dictate their decisions, even when faced with a losing trade.
  • Risk Management is Non-Negotiable: The use of a stop-loss order in the August trade was important. It limited the damage from a trade that went against them and preserved their capital to trade another day.
  • No Strategy is Perfect: Even a profitable strategy will have losing trades. The key is to ensure that the winners are bigger than the losers.
  • The Market is Always Right: In the August trade, Alex's model told them to buy the spread, but the market continued to fall. This is a effective reminder that even the most sophisticated models can be wrong.

Conclusion

This case study provides a glimpse into the real-world application of commodity spread trading. It is a world that demands a unique combination of analytical rigor, psychological fortitude, and unwavering discipline. For those who can master these skills, the rewards can be substantial. But as Alex's experience shows, the path to success is not always a straight line. There will be bumps along the road, and the ability to learn from one's mistakes is perhaps the most important skill of all.